In the unlikeliest of love stories, a couple in New Bedford, Massachusetts recently rekindled their love affair 42 years after getting a divorce , according to a story from South Coast Today. Sources indicate that Ken Kidd and Lindell Magnin, who currently live in the northern part of New Bedford with their three Shih Tzus, celebrated their 45th wedding anniversary this January, although they were only together for three of those years. The couple met at a ballroom dance when she was 18 and he was 17, and started seeking each other every weekend after their initial encounter. After their marriage in the mid-1960s, Ken joined the Air Force, went for training to Oklahoma, and was later shipped to Guam for 18 months of service. In Ken’s words, “[a] year-and-a-half apart is never good for a relationship.” From 1967 to 1968, the couple lived together in Oklahoma, and both of them agree that those 12 months represented the best year of their lives. However, once Ken was sent to Guam, the relationship soon soured. The 18 months of separation was very hard on the couple, and it was made more difficult by their inability to communicate while he was overseas. According to Ken, he was occasionally allowed to call his wife from a special booth on base, but the conversation was usually limited to just a few seconds, and a military officer was there controlling the switchboard and overseeing the conversation. Today, of course, troops are constantly in communication with their families via email and video chatting, which has likely prevented an incalculable number of potential divorce filings. Of course, Ken and Lindell also admit that they failed to write each other very often—particularly Ken, who admits that he was so consumed by his work that he rarely had the time or energy to pen long letters. At the time, Ken says that he and his counterparts were “bombing Vietnam every day” and “working long hours,” working conditions that certainly don’t offer many opportunities for quiet reflection. When Ken returned home on July 1969, the couple couldn’t handle their differences, and made a clean break. They had not accumulated much property, so their divorce process was relatively quick and painless. After the divorce, Lindell flew to Los Angeles to catch a flight back home, and she and Ken never saw each other after that. Well, they never saw each other until a few years ago, more than 40 years after their separation, when Ken’s 19-year-old son convinced his father to join Facebook, where, lo and behold, Ken encountered his former bride. After sharing a few messages, the pair agreed to meet to catch up on each other’s lives and realized they still loved each other. The rest, as they say, is history. Share:

©Copyright 2010 by Total Divorce. Find original content here
To study more about this post, visit the website.
Use this web page to identify information about divorce advice
.

It seems as if people are now throwing parties to celebrate their divorces.  This is a link describing one of these divorce parties as well as the idea of divorce parties generally: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/15/fashion/celebrating-a-divorce-with-a-party-noticed.html  

Celebrity couple Katy Perry and Russell Brand have finalized the terms of their divorce , according to a somber report from CBS News. The couple, who were wed in October 2010 in a ridiculous wedding at a resort inside a tiger reserve in India, announced their plans for a divorce several weeks ago, as the couple weren’t able to reconcile their differences. Sources indicate that a judge has officially granted Perry and Brand a divorce, although the separation won’t be legally official until July. The divorce decree was issued by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Marc Marmaro, who gave the couple the court’s blessing less than six weeks after Brand initially filed for divorce. On the day immediately before the divorce was finalized, Perry filed several documents stating that she and her soon-to-be-former husband have agreed on all the financial issues of their divorce. By agreeing to the financial terms of their divorce out of court via negotiation, Brand and Perry wisely avoided a protracted battle in court, which would have aired the details of their relationship to the public. And, while the terms of the divorce are confidential, they may have not had as much trouble as other celebrity couples in splitting their assets, because the two have relatively similar net worths, and they do not have children, so they did not have to worry about apportioning child custody. In this couple’s case, sources say that Perry will restore her maiden name, Katheryn Elizabeth Hudson. The divorce comes as a low point for the two young celebrities, who married at the peak of their American fame. In 2008, Brand reached his high celebrity point by hosting the MTV Video Music Awards and later starring in films like “Forgetting Sarah Marshall” and “Get Him to the Greek.” Perry, too, reached new levels of fame after 2008 by producing a series of hit songs, including “I Kissed a Girl” and “Firework.” Her fame has only increased recently, as recently performed at the 2012 Grammy Awards. According to sources, the couple will have to wait until July 14 to become legally single because California divorce law forces couples to wait at least six months between their initial divorce filing and the finalization of their separation. This waiting period has drawn plenty of criticism from people seeking divorces, but it was intended to give couples a “cooling off” period before they take the dramatic, if common, step of getting a divorce. Share:

©Copyright 2010 by Total Divorce. Find authentic post here
To help you find out more about this blog post, visit the website.
Use this website to discover details about divorce advice
.

Celebrity couple Katy Perry and Russell Brand have finalized the terms of their divorce , according to a somber report from CBS News. The couple, who were wed in October 2010 in a ridiculous wedding at a resort inside a tiger reserve in India, announced their plans for a divorce several weeks ago, as the couple weren’t able to reconcile their differences. Sources indicate that a judge has officially granted Perry and Brand a divorce, although the separation won’t be legally official until July. The divorce decree was issued by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Marc Marmaro, who gave the couple the court’s blessing less than six weeks after Brand initially filed for divorce. On the day immediately before the divorce was finalized, Perry filed several documents stating that she and her soon-to-be-former husband have agreed on all the financial issues of their divorce. By agreeing to the financial terms of their divorce out of court via negotiation, Brand and Perry wisely avoided a protracted battle in court, which would have aired the details of their relationship to the public. And, while the terms of the divorce are confidential, they may have not had as much trouble as other celebrity couples in splitting their assets, because the two have relatively similar net worths, and they do not have children, so they did not have to worry about apportioning child custody. In this couple’s case, sources say that Perry will restore her maiden name, Katheryn Elizabeth Hudson. The divorce comes as a low point for the two young celebrities, who married at the peak of their American fame. In 2008, Brand reached his high celebrity point by hosting the MTV Video Music Awards and later starring in films like “Forgetting Sarah Marshall” and “Get Him to the Greek.” Perry, too, reached new levels of fame after 2008 by producing a series of hit songs, including “I Kissed a Girl” and “Firework.” Her fame has only increased recently, as recently performed at the 2012 Grammy Awards. According to sources, the couple will have to wait until July 14 to become legally single because California divorce law forces couples to wait at least six months between their initial divorce filing and the finalization of their separation. This waiting period has drawn plenty of criticism from people seeking divorces, but it was intended to give couples a “cooling off” period before they take the dramatic, if common, step of getting a divorce. Share:

©Copyright 2010 by Total Divorce. See authentic content here
To help you read more about this blog post, visit the website.
Utilize this web-site to research specifics about divorce advice
.

When fathers are unable to pay child support, either for a child born out of wedlock or after one partner decides to file for divorce , courts may give them a few warnings before simply throwing them into jail. Some fathers who do not pay child support argue that this practice amounts to throwing them into debtor’s prison. Supporters of the practice, however, claim that the threat of jail keeps many deadbeat dads honest. The debate has reached a tipping point in Georgia, where five fathers have filed a lawsuit against the state for its practice of jailing parents who don’t pay child support, according to a recent report from the Associated Press. Sources indicate that the fathers are claiming in their lawsuit that forcing them to go to jail when they are unable to make child support payments creates a sort of debtor’s prison. In their lawsuit, the fathers also want to force the state of Georgia to provide poor defendants with family law attorneys during their child support hearings. Apparently, many parents cannot afford legal representation during these hearings, which could determine the fate of a parent’s short-term freedom. The men recently won a minor court battle when a judge allowed thousands of other parents who had been jailed for failing to pay child support to join the growing lawsuit. In response to the claim, state attorneys in Georgia filed a motion claiming that the practice of jailing so-called deadbeat parents is a necessary response to an “epidemic” of parents who fail to pay child support. The attorneys claim that the parents in the lawsuit were jailed because of the “consequences of their own poor decision-making,” and that the state should not be blamed for simply enforcing the law. Supporters of the practice also argue that judges often set a “purge fee” below the amount of child support that a parent owes. If the parent can meet this lowered fee, he or she can avoid being thrown into jail. However, despite this “purge fee,” the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports that, in the past decade, 3,612 people were jailed in Georgia’s Gwinett County for failing to pay child support. The average length of stay for each offense was 127 days. And the perpetrators range from the very wealthy to the very poor. According to Sherriff Butch Conway, “[w]e’ve seen some who’ve been jailed come up with $15,000 to $20,000 in a couple of days,” but other defendants “will languish for months and not be able to come up with $100 to $200.” The debate over the legality of sending parents who cannot pay child support to prison will likely rage for years, especially as the current lawsuit makes its way through the court system. Share:

©Copyright 2010 by Total Divorce. Look at authentic posting here
If you want to discover more about this blog post, go to the website.
Use this webpage to discover knowledge about divorce laws
.

Pros and Cons of Prenuptial Agreements

Terrell Owens may have received a sterling bit of news recently as he was allegedly able to convince a judge to substantially lower his child support obligations, which threatened to bankruptcy the former football star. According to a report from celebrity watchdog TMZ.com, Owens was able to convince several different judges that the child support payments for his four children were exorbitantly expensive, particularly in light of his current status as an ex-footballer. Sources also told TMZ that Owens may have secured visitation rights with some of his children, each of whom has a different mother. Owens is reportedly ecstatic about the lowered payments and increased child custody . Originally, Owens was reportedly ordered to pay between $5,000 and $20,000 per child per month, sums which were lofty even when he was making millions of dollars per year to play football. Now, however, Owens is out of business, as no team in the National Football League offered him a contract this season, suggesting that Owens’ career could soon be over. In light of this career shift, Owens filed the requests to lower his child support payments, and the judges likely obliged because Owens is literally making no money right now. The reduction of his child support allegations also comes on the heels of Owens’ court appearance after a warrant was issued for his arrest after he fell short on payments to one of his children. The court, apparently, took pity, knowing that Owens couldn’t afford his obligations. According to TMZ, Owens owes $20,000 per month support to Monique Reynolds, with whom he has an 11-year-old son, but a judge allegedly lowered this monthly payment to $11,202—still expensive, but significantly lower than the original payment. In addition, Owens originally owed $20,000 per month to Kimberly Floyd to support their 7-year-old daughter, but this was lowered to $15,000 in 2008, and will likely be lowered again. Next, Owens reportedly pays $13,400 per month in child support to Samelia Miller, with whom he had a child in 2006. Finally, Owens pays roughly $5,000 per month to Melanie Paige Smith for the support of their child, although, according to TMZ, this child support obligation was the only one for which Owens did not request a reduction. Of course, while Owens may be able to lower his child support payments, he still has other financial obligations that are weighing him down. Sources indicate that he must pay more than $60,000 each month on payments for various properties, and that his home in Georgia is currently in foreclosure. Share:

©Copyright 2010 by Total Divorce. Check out original posting here
For you to discover more about this post, go to the website.
Use this website to obtain details about divorce laws
.

The decision to pursue a divorce is  a difficult one. The divorce process is extensive and exhausting for everyone involved. One of the early choices you will have to make is if you want to pursue a traditional divorce by hiring an attorney and going to court, try to work things through on your own, or use the services of a trained mediator. What is mediation?

©Copyright 2010 by Divorce Saloon. View authentic posting here
To actually study more about this blog post, visit the website.
Utilize this website to identify knowledge about divorce facts
.

©Copyright 2010 by Divorce Saloon. View original post here
For you to learn more about this post, visit the website.
Use this website to research specifics about divorce statistics
.